Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: The output of the workflow sub node is not wrapped #2088

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The output of the workflow sub node is not wrapped

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ def hand_event_node_result(self, current_node, node_result_future):
current_node.id,
current_node.up_node_id_list,
'', False, 0, 0, {'node_is_end': True,
'runtime_node_id': current_node.runtime_node_id,
'runtime_node_id': real_node_id,
'node_type': current_node.type,
'view_type': view_type,
'child_node': child_node,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided Python code snippet has several areas that might require attention:

  1. String Formatting and Interpolation: The use of '{key}: {value}' for both single quotes around keys and values can lead to confusion. It's generally more readable to consistently format it without the surrounding quotes.

  2. Potential Issues:

    • There seems to be a mismatch between the dictionary key 'node_is_end' used in one instance with 'view_type'. Ensure these match throughout the codebase.
    • Directly accessing current_node.runtime_node_id when updating another node’s dictionary ({'runtime_node_id': real_node_id}) is incorrect unless there's a specific reason for this operation.
  3. Suggested Improvements:

    • Use consistent string formatting without unnecessary quotes.
    • Consider renaming variables where possible to improve readability and consistency.
    • Verify that all variables involved in the dictionary updates (like 'runtime_node_id') have valid content before being used.
    • Add comments if they clarify complex logic or control flow steps.

Here is a revised version of the relevant section with improved formatting and naming conventions:

def hand_event_node_result(self, current_node, node_result_future):
    content = ...  # Replace with actual value or initialization
    view_type = "default"  # Set appropriate type based on context
    
    runtime_node_id = current_node.runtime_node_id
    result_dict = {
        'node_type': current_node.type,
        'runtime_node_id': runtime_node_id,
        'view_type': view_type,
        'child_node': child_node,
        'node_is_end': node_is_end
    }
    
    # Process other conditions similarly

If you need further assistance with improving your code, feel free to ask!

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 62dd0eb into main Jan 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_workflow branch January 23, 2025 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant