Replies: 3 comments
-
It's definitely technically possible, one could supply an image as a mask (e.g. a transparent .png). Not sure when I'll be able to get to this, but I'm more than open to implementing it for sure, great idea. Or were you thinking of something more automated, like blurring the image and using a morphological filter on the more stable areas of the image? In the meantime, note that if you get the latest source code, you can supply a rectangular ROI (see this comment for details). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hopefully with adjusting kernel size and the new region editor, it should be easier to mask out certain areas and small blobs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I don't think what the original poster meant. If the infrared shines into water droplet or falling snowflake while the shutter speed is rather slow then such blobs (of merely white pixels) move vertically (or in all kinds of direction if the wind is deflected from the wall). Masking a region does not help and one cannot increase kernel size to get rid of these false motion hits. The algorithm would first take into account it is moving from top to the bottom to catch most of the situations and second, that there are typically many such trajectories, they have white color provided it was captured during night. is the current time accessible in the stream? Or information it is captured with IR-cut filter enabled? Needless to say a heavy rain during the day triggers also same false alarm. The motion algorith should better work with a (BW?) sketch of the image and ignore this type of "noise" in front. At has to work with more abstract glimpse of the scene. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just wondering if there is a way for DVR-Scan to detect "blobs of pixel" or "continuous areas" to prevent false detection due to rain, snow and noise.
If not could this be implemented as enhancement?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions