Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Periodic IBM (multigpu Z direction) #9

Open
MarcoAurelioFerrari opened this issue Feb 7, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Periodic IBM (multigpu Z direction) #9

MarcoAurelioFerrari opened this issue Feb 7, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@MarcoAurelioFerrari
Copy link
Contributor

When using a moving IBM particle in conjunction with periodic BC, the particle will just leave the domain instead of appearing in the other side of the domain.
@MarcoAurelioFerrari MarcoAurelioFerrari added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 7, 2021
@MarcoAurelioFerrari
Copy link
Contributor Author

Implemented with together with multi-gpu

@MarcoAurelioFerrari
Copy link
Contributor Author

Offset periodic implemented in X and Y directions

@MarcoAurelioFerrari
Copy link
Contributor Author

Offset periodic in Z-direction needs work in multi-gpu
For 1 gpu, it can be performed by changing the idx in gpuForceInterpolationSpread to:
IBM_BC_Z_0 + (posBase[2]+zk+ (IBM_BC_Z_E) - IBM_BC_Z_0-IBM_BC_Z_0)%((IBM_BC_Z_E) - IBM_BC_Z_0)

@MarcoAurelioFerrari MarcoAurelioFerrari added bug Something isn't working and removed bug Something isn't working labels Aug 24, 2021
@MarcoAurelioFerrari MarcoAurelioFerrari changed the title Periodic IBM Periodic IBM (multigpu Z direction) Aug 24, 2021
@MarcoAurelioFerrari MarcoAurelioFerrari added bug Something isn't working and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MarcoAurelioFerrari