You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear authors, thank you for sharing your work. I was wondering if you can also provide the code for identifying the incorrect labels. From what I understand the label corrections to produce a corrected version are given, however, the code to reproduce is not available.
Best regards,
Georgios
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We identified the incorrect labels manually, while we utilized some tools to help speed up human review. I believe @frreiss has them available but I don't think they have changed the manual nature of identifying labels in any way.
Can you please clarify how we are supposed to combine the results of CoNLL_2.ipynb, CoNLL_3.ipynb, CoNLL_4.ipynb notebooks in order to obtain the results you report in the paper? In the paper you mention that " We
considered any label where fewer than 7 models agreed with the corpus label to be “flagged”". Is this the only condition you use in order to flag labels?
Dear authors, thank you for sharing your work. I was wondering if you can also provide the code for identifying the incorrect labels. From what I understand the label corrections to produce a corrected version are given, however, the code to reproduce is not available.
Best regards,
Georgios
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: