You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think about creating project files for NetBeans and Eclipse?
For users of these IDEs (which are about 99% of Java developers), it could be an additional incentive to contribute to the project.
We should also maintain the command-line tools so that everyone can choose their preferred development method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FidoCadJ should remain IDE-agnostic at least in the basic form. One of the reasons for this is that I will not use them and that people have requested a panoplia of different IDE's in the past (fads tend to last a few years).
I will not change my development method and I realize that many people like them.
It can be possible to include project files in the FidoCadJ projects, but under the following conditions:
keep them all within a specific directory or subdirectory
this choice and philosophy is clearly documented
I am not in charge of that 😎
Think about long-term development. The risk to be circumscribed is to have these project files become obsolete by the time people interested in a particular IDE cease perhaps one day to be involved in the project. I think this is acceptable for a file in a subdirectory (say, FidoCadJ/dev_tools/NetBeans) but not for files in the root directory.
What do you think about creating project files for NetBeans and Eclipse?
For users of these IDEs (which are about 99% of Java developers), it could be an additional incentive to contribute to the project.
We should also maintain the command-line tools so that everyone can choose their preferred development method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: