-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rewrite waterdynamics to use AnalysisBase #18
Comments
See MDAnalysis/mdanalysis#4310 . This issue may eventually be moved to a separate MDAKit repository. |
@ALescoulie are you still interested in working on waterdynamics? If so, it's now in a stable MDAKit state with a release and ready to support new innovation or just good ol' refactoring. |
I'm interested, just been occupied working on other projects, hoping to get started on it soon after I finish my personal portfolio website and some MD-SAPT stuff. |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Code in analysis.waterdynamics does not behave like most of the analysis tools that ship with MDAnalysis.
There are various inconsistencies, notably
and the current approach also does not allow us to easily parallelize (#4080 ).
Describe the solution you'd like
Refactor code to use AnalysisBase, see how to write your own analysis code
Describe alternatives you've considered
Do nothing and maintain the code as is (but do not consider any enhancements or improvements).
Additional context
We
are also consideringdecided moving wateranalysis to a separate MDAKit. Once the code is on a separate development track, it may be easier for users/developers to contribute.MDAnalysis/mdanalysis#4310
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: