Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to detail on LFRic naming conventions #1070

Open
jfrost-mo opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Link to detail on LFRic naming conventions #1070

jfrost-mo opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member

What problem does your feature request solve?

To help new users we should provide a link/indication of what LFRic naming conventions are at point of use within rose edit, on the lists of variables to process.

Describe the solution you'd like

Our current definition is based on the _stash_to_lfric.py file, which isn't that human readable and only contains limited information. It would be good to link to a more authoritative source, however I'm not sure if one exists.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Not sure of anywhere myself other than the spreadsheet and the STASH2LFRic file. Might be worth checking with someone from RAD. If we can't find anything I am happy for the conversations to be marked as resolved provided we open an issue so that it gets put in place for solving it when we know more.
- @daflack in #1055 (comment)

Also unsure, suspect its local information stored by Ian Boutle/Paul Earnshaw et al., as LFRic is still mostly being tested
- @jwarner8 in #1055 (comment)

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant