-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Excessively large exciton diffusion length calculated from the exciton diffusion test #120
Comments
The diffusion length is calculated using the mean displacement distance of the excitons in the simulation. I can't say for sure what might be going on. I am not actively developing this simulation right now, so you'll have to dig into the code and figure out what's going on. If you find any bugs and fix them, please consider submitting a pull request. |
Dear Mike,
Thank you very much for your reply! I found that the difference between the
calculated diffusion length and measured one is due to the different
definition. Taking into account this difference, they agree with each other
fairly well. Have you got the recent email I sent to you regarding the
higher-than-initial exciton density in the dynamic test? I think in this
case the program generates some unphysical results. Thank you.
best regards,
Wenchao
…On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 3:20 AM Michael C. Heiber ***@***.***> wrote:
The diffusion length is calculated using the mean displacement distance of
the excitons in the simulation. I can't say for sure what might be going
on. I am not actively developing this simulation right now, so you'll have
to dig into the code and figure out what's going on. If you find any bugs
and fix them, please consider submitting a pull request.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/MikeHeiber/Excimontec/issues/120*issuecomment-1030719422__;Iw!!Nmw4Hv0!jClVMGLW-2lQOLQDL4yQgR068jWQ9m6O8EcsRabkvETEsyru4eEC5iqTYgRQ-A9aWeuExOY$>,
or unsubscribe
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOKIT6F7CKPHDZN654HA3N3UZW5EXANCNFSM5DGVS7AA__;!!Nmw4Hv0!jClVMGLW-2lQOLQDL4yQgR068jWQ9m6O8EcsRabkvETEsyru4eEC5iqTYgRQ-A9ar4yA-s4$>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675__;!!Nmw4Hv0!jClVMGLW-2lQOLQDL4yQgR068jWQ9m6O8EcsRabkvETEsyru4eEC5iqTYgRQ-A9a9TFn04c$>
or Android
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign*3Dnotification-email*26utm_medium*3Demail*26utm_source*3Dgithub__;JSUlJSU!!Nmw4Hv0!jClVMGLW-2lQOLQDL4yQgR068jWQ9m6O8EcsRabkvETEsyru4eEC5iqTYgRQ-A9aza89n2A$>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Postdoctoral fellow, Kaust Solar Center (KSC)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
Al Kindi (Building 5), Level 3,
Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
e-mail: ***@***.***
--
This message and its contents, including attachments are intended solely
for the original recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or have
received this message in error, please notify me immediately and delete
this message from your computer system. Any unauthorized use or
distribution is prohibited. Please consider the environment before printing
this email.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have been trying to use Excimontec to study exciton diffusion in nonfullerene acceptor materials. First I used the dynamic test to reproduce the transients obtained from the pump-probe experiments. With appropriate choice of simulation parameters, such as the hopping rates, the energetic disorder, and the exciton lifetime, the experimental transients can be well reproduced. Then with these parameters I run the exciton diffusion test to calculate the diffusion lengths. However the results turn out to be much larger than the ones obtained by directly fitting the experimental transients. An extreme case is the NFA material IT4F, the calculated value is 48 nm while the experimental value is 27nm. For other cases, I find that the calculated value divided by$\sqrt{2}$ can be very close to the experimental value. But we cannot explain this $\sqrt{2}$ factor. It might be somehow related to the algorithm. Can you explain more about the algorithm in the User Manual? One question is that if the $L_d$ is calculated by first reaction algorithm directly, or the diffusion constant $D$ is calculated, and $L_d$ is obtained by $L_d=\sqrt{2dD\tau}$ . Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: