You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some users are blocked from enabling AI features due to security concerns around OpenAI APIs – e.g. ZEN-24513.
Describe the solution you'd like
Seems like the easiest way to eliminate the concerns would be self-hosting a model for most tasks, which could replace OpenAI. The data would stay within PostHog's control, removing a subprocessor. The experience would still be seamless for users.
Of course, proprietary models tend to be more powerful, and self-hosting is an effort.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A user also proposed the ability to provide a path to a custom model self-hosted by that company. I'm afraid that would be a minefield though, with lots of ways for things to go wrong, and no quality assurances from us.
Debug info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature request
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Some users are blocked from enabling AI features due to security concerns around OpenAI APIs – e.g. ZEN-24513.
Describe the solution you'd like
Seems like the easiest way to eliminate the concerns would be self-hosting a model for most tasks, which could replace OpenAI. The data would stay within PostHog's control, removing a subprocessor. The experience would still be seamless for users.
Of course, proprietary models tend to be more powerful, and self-hosting is an effort.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A user also proposed the ability to provide a path to a custom model self-hosted by that company. I'm afraid that would be a minefield though, with lots of ways for things to go wrong, and no quality assurances from us.
Debug info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: