Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducibility issues with ExecRepoBench #374

Open
g-drozdov opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Reproducibility issues with ExecRepoBench #374

g-drozdov opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@g-drozdov
Copy link

Hello qwen team!

I am trying to reproduce results of ExecRepoBench, but got different numbers, so I have some questions:

  1. Is it true that verify environments (described here) command shouldn't produce any errors? When I ran this command I got 40% samples containing error in srderr field, e.g.
    for /Chronyk/test_chronyk.py
  warnings.warn(PytestDeprecationWarning(_DEFAULT_FIXTURE_LOOP_SCOPE_UNSET))
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/tmp/tmp87jcuy04/Chronyk/evaluate_repo.py", line 27, in <module>
    run_pytest_in_directory(test_path)
  File "/var/tmp/tmp87jcuy04/Chronyk/evaluate_repo.py", line 8, in run_pytest_in_directory
    raise Exception("Assert Error")
Exception: Assert Error
  1. Could you share the environment in which you run the ExecRepoBench commands? Because, I’m getting slightly different numbers.
    Even with a large number of errors during verification, e.g., I was able to get an average pass@1 for Qwen-Coder-7B close to yours, but still not the same (in my experiments it is 19.1, in your paper it is 19.8)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant