Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let's add n to this table too, just to make sure we are doing the right thing (and also fix the data table). #41

Closed
oesteban opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@oesteban
Copy link
Contributor

          Let's add n to this table too, just to make sure we are doing the right thing (and also fix the data table).

Originally posted by @oesteban in #38 (comment)

@celprov
Copy link
Contributor

celprov commented Feb 11, 2025

@oesteban you can take care of this when you deleted the duplicated IQMs and regenerate the BA plot, the table is generated by the same code

stats.append({"Name": key, "Bias": md, "loa_lower": loa_lower, "loa_upper": loa_upper, "ci_lower": ci_lower, "ci_upper": ci_upper, "ci_lower_non_param": ci_lower_non_param, "ci_upper_non_param": ci_upper_non_param})

@oesteban
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, that'd be easy for the data table but I'm more concerned about the data actually.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants