Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No websocket equivalent of PUT /things/<thing>/actions/<action>/<id> #85

Open
mrstegeman opened this issue Mar 28, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@mrstegeman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@benfrancis
Copy link
Member

I'm not 100% sure this and #84 are actually needed.

I know the specification says that an action request can be updated with a PUT, but have you come across use cases for this yet? I'm wondering whether action requests should be immutable (by the client) and you should instead send a follow-up action request with the new data?

This also raises some questions about concurrency and about how to create eventual consistency between the server and all clients.

@mrstegeman
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, I've not yet come across a use case for the PUT. I'd rather just have that removed from the spec, at least for the time being.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants