Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The question about batch_size/val_iteration/lr. #11

Open
xiaopingzeng opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

The question about batch_size/val_iteration/lr. #11

xiaopingzeng opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@xiaopingzeng
Copy link

xiaopingzeng commented Jul 10, 2019

Thanks for your implementation. When I run the code you give, it just uses 1325MiB GPU. I want to accelerate the speed, so I change the hyper-parameters of batch_size=256or512(default 64) and val_iteration=256or128(default 1024), but I didn't get the ideal result. What should I do? Must val_iteration be 1024?

@sanyouwu
Copy link

I have the same question with you. In my opinion, the number of labeled data is less than unlabeled. So, in this case, when val_iteration =1024, we will run the labeled data repeated many times in a epoch. Does it essential and reasonable? @xiaopingzeng @YU1ut

@YU1ut
Copy link
Owner

YU1ut commented Aug 2, 2019

In my opinion, this method needs to see the same sample with different augmentations a lot of times and get enough mixup samples to improve the performance. So, it is necessary to run a lot of iteration to get enough samples. I have no idea how to accelerate the speed of training at this moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants