You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your contribution.
In the paper, the author did some ablation study. For verify the accuracy of your work, I repeat these configurations and get satisfying results.
However, I find an amazing result, that is the accuracy under T = 1 ( Mixmatch without temperature sharpening) is larger than T = 0.5. ## I only change parameter T, and other parameters are the same as yours.
So, can I get an inference that temperature sharpening operate does not work? I am not confident about this since the author emphasizes its importance in the paper.@YU1ut
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your contribution.
In the paper, the author did some ablation study. For verify the accuracy of your work, I repeat these configurations and get satisfying results.
However, I find an amazing result, that is the accuracy under T = 1 ( Mixmatch without temperature sharpening) is larger than T = 0.5. ## I only change parameter T, and other parameters are the same as yours.
So, can I get an inference that temperature sharpening operate does not work? I am not confident about this since the author emphasizes its importance in the paper.@YU1ut
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: