You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to train the ConvNeXt-Tiny model solely on VKITTI2 without loading any pre-trained model, after some steps, here are the results compared to the released convnext-tiny:
more interestingly, the point cloud reconstructed by my trained model is much more "discrete" compared to the model you released:
It seems to me something goes wrong when upsampling the 1/4 depth map to full-resolution depth map.
I think the only difference between my trained model and your released model is that the released model was trained on a larger mixed dataset, while my trained model is only trained on VKITTI2. Have you encounter such problems? or should I just use more data in training can solve this problem? or the learning rate I used is different from yours.. etc...
Thank you very much for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello!
I tried to train the ConvNeXt-Tiny model solely on VKITTI2 without loading any pre-trained model, after some steps, here are the results compared to the released convnext-tiny:
more interestingly, the point cloud reconstructed by my trained model is much more "discrete" compared to the model you released:
It seems to me something goes wrong when upsampling the 1/4 depth map to full-resolution depth map.
I think the only difference between my trained model and your released model is that the released model was trained on a larger mixed dataset, while my trained model is only trained on VKITTI2. Have you encounter such problems? or should I just use more data in training can solve this problem? or the learning rate I used is different from yours.. etc...
Thank you very much for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: