[StableSwap] Issue 3: Fees, Incentives, and Yield Distribution

[polarker]

Parent issue: #24

Objective:

Set up fee structures and yield distribution mechanisms for the StableSwap protocol.

Description:

This issue focuses on implementing swap fees, distributing them to liquidity providers, and calculating yields for LP tokens.

Tasks:

1. Design a fee structure for trades performed in the pool.
2. Implement adjustable parameters for swap fees.
3. Develop logic to distribute collected fees to liquidity providers based on their share of the pool.
4. Periodically calculate and update yields for LP tokens.
5. Write tests to validate fee collection, distribution, and yield calculations.

Acceptance Criteria:

• Swap fees are collected and distributed correctly to liquidity providers.
• Fee parameters are adjustable without affecting ongoing operations.
• Yields for LP tokens are calculated and updated periodically.
• Tests ensure proper fee and yield management, including edge cases.

[mimisavage]

I'd like to handle this task.

[JoE11-y]

Can I work on this, please?

[ShantelPeters]

Would love to tackle this!

[Supa-mega]

Could I try solving this?

[petersdt]

I’d like to work on this.

[kfastov]

Hi, thank you for showing interest, this issue will be available after we get base code from #31

[abdegenius]

Can I tackle this one?

[CEOliam]

Can I handle this task?

[aniruddhaaps]

To implement this issue I would setup a fee policy on the trades with adjustable parameters to provide flexibility. Build logic to proportionally apportion collected fees to liquidity providers and compute and update yields for LP tokens at regular periods. Functionality should be validated through comprehensive testing, where fee distribution and yield management are ensured to be correct.

[Jemiiah]

Hello @polarker @kfastov, i'm a fronend web3 developer who has made over 75+ contribution during past OD Hacks pls I would love to work on this issue, I can create a PR before 48 hours elapses

[Jemiiah]

Thank you for the assign.

This is dependent on #31 and #32.

[kfastov]

@Jemiiah Yep, you may coordinate with the guy who tackles #32, he already submitted draft PR, and maybe with #31 assignee too. I believe you can make the example boilerplate together without waiting 😄

[raduciobanu22]

@Jemiiah Yep, you may coordinate with the guy who tackles #32, he already submitted draft PR, and maybe with #31 assignee too. I believe you can make the example boilerplate together without waiting 😄

+1 @Jemiiah Are you still interested to work on this? If yes, feel free to continue without waiting. Otherwise I will reassign the issue to someone else.

[Jagadeeshftw]

Can I work on this, please?

[raduciobanu22]

@Jagadeeshftw Assigned it to you!

[Jagadeeshftw]

Thank you so much @raduciobanu22. I will start work on it immediately