You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we use advanced facets (disjunctive or hierarchical), we have a multiple part problem:
facet count can come from the main or the sub response, and they can be approximated. The algolia api can send us back informations about the approximation. But this information is not merged properly (we only take the info from the main response)
the approximation information might be different between the subs and main responses. We should have a pesimistic approach here, and consider aproximate if at least one of the answer is approximated
the approximation data should be easily available for our users. For example, when using getFacetValues, or have a new method isFacetCountExhaustive(facetName)
This discussion was converted from issue #5725 on July 11, 2023 15:39.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
When we use advanced facets (disjunctive or hierarchical), we have a multiple part problem:
getFacetValues
, or have a new methodisFacetCountExhaustive(facetName)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions