You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since each module is first searched for in the linked list via index, the loop is 100 * (100+1)/2 = 5050 for 100 modules. With 500 modules it is 125,250 and with 1000 modules 500500. It is faster to run through the linked list with an enumerator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @FellowWithLaptop, I totally agree. I'll be stripping out the collections soon and replacing these with a more generic collection which will also have the enumerator. Thank you for your feedback!
One thing I need to concider with this is that modules have the ability to leave the cyclic calling mechanism, so I'll need to take care with the enumerators to correctly idenfity this.
Since each module is first searched for in the linked list via index, the loop is 100 * (100+1)/2 = 5050 for 100 modules. With 500 modules it is 125,250 and with 1000 modules 500500. It is faster to run through the linked list with an enumerator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: