You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, overdrive has a great concept, thanks for the work you've done!
I'm having a problem with the use cases stated in the title: I'm trying to animate a menu transition and the React-router Links in that menu break the animation with an error stating they need to be in an ancestor of a Router element.
I figured the problem comes from the fact that the animation is rendered in a div, that is created as a child of the body element (which is above the Router). It may as well be the case that the renderSubtreeIntoContainer method doesn't give access to the parent elements, because I tried replacing window.document.body.appendChild with window.document.getElementById('App') (the main class in my tests, that is nested in a BrowserRouter).
Is this for simplicity's sake or would it complicate things if the start and end animation elements were rendered each as a child of the Overdrive component (in the render function)? They have absolute positions after all.
I believe that way the renderSubtreeIntoContainer call wouldn't be needed.
I tried implementing the above but quickly found myself over my head with the debugging, I'm quite new to React.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, overdrive has a great concept, thanks for the work you've done!
I'm having a problem with the use cases stated in the title: I'm trying to animate a menu transition and the React-router Links in that menu break the animation with an error stating they need to be in an ancestor of a Router element.
I figured the problem comes from the fact that the animation is rendered in a div, that is created as a child of the body element (which is above the Router). It may as well be the case that the renderSubtreeIntoContainer method doesn't give access to the parent elements, because I tried replacing window.document.body.appendChild with window.document.getElementById('App') (the main class in my tests, that is nested in a BrowserRouter).
Is this for simplicity's sake or would it complicate things if the start and end animation elements were rendered each as a child of the Overdrive component (in the render function)? They have absolute positions after all.
I believe that way the renderSubtreeIntoContainer call wouldn't be needed.
I tried implementing the above but quickly found myself over my head with the debugging, I'm quite new to React.
I am facing tha same issue. When navigating through the routes via Link, I get the following error
Error: Invariant failed: You should not use <Link> outside a <Router>
Hi, overdrive has a great concept, thanks for the work you've done!
I'm having a problem with the use cases stated in the title: I'm trying to animate a menu transition and the React-router Links in that menu break the animation with an error stating they need to be in an ancestor of a Router element.
I figured the problem comes from the fact that the animation is rendered in a div, that is created as a child of the body element (which is above the Router). It may as well be the case that the renderSubtreeIntoContainer method doesn't give access to the parent elements, because I tried replacing
window.document.body.appendChild
withwindow.document.getElementById('App')
(the main class in my tests, that is nested in a BrowserRouter).Is this for simplicity's sake or would it complicate things if the start and end animation elements were rendered each as a child of the Overdrive component (in the render function)? They have absolute positions after all.
I believe that way the renderSubtreeIntoContainer call wouldn't be needed.
I tried implementing the above but quickly found myself over my head with the debugging, I'm quite new to React.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: