You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, a ContentType and its Fields are tied together by the Field's id. If a superadministrator is manipulating the ContentType via CLI, this is rather inconvenient. Instead, we should refactor the implementation so that Fields are tied to a ContentType via their unique, indexed name_id field. Let's research how we can do this performantly. If we're unable to do so, we should remove the name_id field and continue to reference by id, but create uniqueness validation logic scoped to a ContentType that normalizes the Field's name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, a
ContentType
and itsFields
are tied together by theField
'sid
. If a superadministrator is manipulating theContentType
via CLI, this is rather inconvenient. Instead, we should refactor the implementation so thatFields
are tied to aContentType
via their unique, indexedname_id
field. Let's research how we can do this performantly. If we're unable to do so, we should remove thename_id
field and continue to reference byid
, but create uniqueness validation logic scoped to aContentType
that normalizes theField
's name.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: