You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I opened up this draft PR but I'm posting here for visibility.
I've been using LLM's to check my circuit theory and help with circuit design and PCB design in general. I thought SKiDL's python based circuit descriptions would work great with LLM's. So far the results seem to be promising, but it's clear that I need to include more information on each subcircuit, part, and connections for the LLM to give better analysis.
@devbisme if you think it's worth adding to SKiDL it'll keep working on it. I just made a basic example that I only tested with Claude so far.
I think this is a very good topic for discussion and what the role of LLM would be. For the analysis of the circuit using LLM, I don't see what It can tell you.
The current use would be for doing design reviews. The large training sets for LLMs should include texts for electronics and PCB design, so the hope would be it could do chain-of-thought reasoning to look for problem areas. That may not work currently (we'll find out), but it may in the future as these things improve.
I opened up this draft PR but I'm posting here for visibility.
I've been using LLM's to check my circuit theory and help with circuit design and PCB design in general. I thought SKiDL's python based circuit descriptions would work great with LLM's. So far the results seem to be promising, but it's clear that I need to include more information on each subcircuit, part, and connections for the LLM to give better analysis.
@devbisme if you think it's worth adding to SKiDL it'll keep working on it. I just made a basic example that I only tested with Claude so far.
Here's an example output analysis file:
subcircuits_analysis.txt
From running this code:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: