You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
regarding issue 1266 where lacking variance in icon sizes can result in irregular icon size outputs. This does not seem to be the case when we use hard links and then use the image-{width,height} properties.
Is there any reason we could not treat the icons the same as image hardlinks when we include a image-{width,height} property or even just in general use? I'm unaware of any underlying trade offs to this approach so forgive my naivety if there is some.
Description of the requested feature
regarding issue 1266 where lacking variance in icon sizes can result in irregular icon size outputs. This does not seem to be the case when we use hard links and then use the image-{width,height} properties.
Is there any reason we could not treat the icons the same as image hardlinks when we include a image-{width,height} property or even just in general use? I'm unaware of any underlying trade offs to this approach so forgive my naivety if there is some.
Proposed configuration syntax
No response
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: