Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How is loadpoint to root circuit assignment expected to work? #587

Closed
andig opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

How is loadpoint to root circuit assignment expected to work? #587

andig opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@andig
Copy link
Member

andig commented Jul 28, 2024

From evcc-io/evcc#14261 (comment):

But I I have noticed a difference in behavior and how the documentation describes how it should work. This statement: "Alle Ladepunkte ohne explizite Stromkreiszuordnung werden diesem Hauptstromkreis zugeordnet. " I conclude from this that if I have only one circuit "main" I do not need to specify "circuit" on the loadpoint configuration. But if I try this loadmanagement does not work on mij loadpoints. I need to specify "circuit: main" on the loadpoints and then it works.

Original doku: #567

/cc @premultiply wie war der letzte Stand?

@andig
Copy link
Member Author

andig commented Jul 28, 2024

@Roeland54 @naltatis aktuell müssen die Ladepunkte explizit einem Circuit zugeordnet werden. Der Satz in der Doku:

"Alle Ladepunkte ohne explizite Stromkreiszuordnung werden diesem Hauptstromkreis zugeordnet. "

ist aktuell falsch.

@naltatis
Copy link
Member

naltatis commented Aug 2, 2024

Die Doku ist inzwischen an den aktuellen Softwarestand angepasst.

Jetzt stellt sich nur die Frage, ob das aktuelle Verhalten ein Bug oder ein Feature ist 😄 @premultiply

@andig
Copy link
Member Author

andig commented Aug 2, 2024

Feature!

@naltatis
Copy link
Member

Feature!

Dann ist hier nichts mehr zu tun.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants