You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The front page has four gene sets to cycle through, these are "hallmark" gene sets from msigdb, so while semi-artificial they should provide relatively good signal.
The first option is for the msigb Notch hallmark set. We'd expect this to give a clear signal for the Notch pathway, but the results on the main GO site seem a weird hodge podge of developmental processes with no cohesive story (cerebellar molecular layer formation / hemocyte differentiation / angiogenesis).
IBA restricted (via functionome) gives a much simpler story (Notch + Wnt signaling).
The front page has four gene sets to cycle through, these are "hallmark" gene sets from msigdb, so while semi-artificial they should provide relatively good signal.
The first option is for the msigb Notch hallmark set. We'd expect this to give a clear signal for the Notch pathway, but the results on the main GO site seem a weird hodge podge of developmental processes with no cohesive story (cerebellar molecular layer formation / hemocyte differentiation / angiogenesis).
IBA restricted (via functionome) gives a much simpler story (Notch + Wnt signaling).
Here is a perplexity deepresearch report on the same gene set: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-is-the-likely-underlying-t7GiIzw7SraQCX_GT9gLEQ
We should pick gene sets that show GO in the best light (or restrict human to IBA by default)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: