Is this ethical? #480
Replies: 4 comments 13 replies
-
I am not connected to the deep-live-cam project. Your concerns are valid and you might be interested in following the $500,000 NEH grant (United States) to study these issues, announced the day after you wrote your comment. https://chass.ncsu.edu/news/2024/08/28/nc-state-secures-500k-neh-grant-to-launch-ai-center-in-chass/ The only benefit I see with this deepfake technology is to continue to ensure females of all ages look "perfect" online, as in Jane Jetson's "morning mask" (e g., link below). You know this type of live face swapping software will bring in a lot of money, not just be used to screw up elections, wreck relationships, and incite wars. All the big make-up companies will have their own app! Of course there will be more screwed up kids, but who cares. (BTW I'm being facetious.) https://youtu.be/EwOcT3sK8Eg?feature=shared Good luck. This post will likely be removed so I hope you get this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is no doubt this technology will perpetually be used for unethical purposes, perhaps the most disturbing of these being pornography. In other words, if you don't know how easy it is to create deep fakes you are more vulnerable to its influence, which makes its use as a psychological weapon of control much more effective. So I think it's a good thing to know that it is possible to do! That being said, it will take copious discussion, mountains of research, and many brave heroes to combat the monstrous egregore of pornography this technology will most certainly invigorate... I cannot lie though that I am very happy I spent half of my day head scratching over errors, figuring out how to install this thing. I am happy because I was able to get it working! I think what makes it acceptable to use though, is that I do not wish to use this tool to engross myself in a delusion of self-desires. Like many others, I will wield this as a tool for art—to express the uncanny and zany memes of our modern era, which is very much driven by these novel technologies becoming easily accessible to everyday people. We are playing with a Promethean fire, and should fire cease to exist for the fact that it burns the ignorant? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since it’s been two weeks and @hacksider still has not addressed my points, I’m going to assume he does not have the examples I asked for and would like to reiterate for anyone else who sees this: what are the ethical use cases for this repo? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
they are already disabling related apps. Like the one i used - Roop unleashed. https://github.com/C0untFloyd/roop-unleashed I’m pretty new to GitHub, so I initially posted this in the wrong place. I found this issue topic later, but I still think this is a really bad direction to take. We need to learn how to deal with the dangers and possibilities that come with the level of AI we have today. Right now, it’s a Python Git project, and it’s about 90% perfect, but most people can still tell the difference between fake and real. Removing apps like this from a platform as big as GitHub at this point means our society doesn’t have to confront the consequences right now, while only a handful of people have the knowledge to use this technology in harmful ways. In a few years, the entire process of creating deepfakes and face-swaps will likely be indistinguishable from reality. By then, it’ll be as simple as using an AI-powered Android app on your iPhone 25. It would be smarter to allow a small percentage of people to use it now, so we can create new laws, develop detection tools, adapt, and raise awareness about its possibilities and risks. Disabling these apps right now just means the problem will be much bigger in the future when AI makes it even easier to misuse this technology. Imagine cave people inventing the hammer, 1 cavemen kills another cavemen. So they decide to trow all hammers away. and to not tell their children what a hammer is, and how to use it safely. And that its a bad idea to hit someone with a hammer. 50 year later, when the children have kids themself. There is a big hammer rain, and there is hammers everywhere. No info to be found about this strange tool. Because when they search for hammer instructions on github it says This repository has been disabled. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The simple fact that even the examples show this tech being used with famous and political figures is deeply disturbing. I have already searched through the discussions with no results found for ethics. I have also read the statement in the README and I understand that you are taking “precautions” to prevent misuse, but I don’t think it’s enough. Your statement doesn’t even mention the misinformation or scam potential, which is also disturbing, especially after tech nearly identical to this was used in a $25M scam in Feb 2024. This repo has, essentially, taken technology that was previously only accessible to the most skilled and resourceful scammers and placed it in the hands of script kiddies. I fail to see how a repo like this has ANY ethical application whatsoever and I believe that even open sourcing this application was unethical.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions