You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like the numbers used in the "Editors" column lists the number of unique registered¹ users who have made at least one edit in that test wiki. However, this number is not very useful, because the effort it takes to make only one edit is very little. I would prefer if we could list – perhaps in a separate column – the number of users who have more than 10 edits, because that gets rid of a lot of the "long tail". As an example, Wp/ppl currently has 132 unique editors, but "only" 60 of those have made more than 10 edits, and that's a more useful number.
¹ At least I think so (and hope so). Number of anonymous contributors is not useful/interesting for us (LangCom).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems like the numbers used in the "Editors" column lists the number of unique registered¹ users who have made at least one edit in that test wiki. However, this number is not very useful, because the effort it takes to make only one edit is very little. I would prefer if we could list – perhaps in a separate column – the number of users who have more than 10 edits, because that gets rid of a lot of the "long tail". As an example, Wp/ppl currently has 132 unique editors, but "only" 60 of those have made more than 10 edits, and that's a more useful number.
¹ At least I think so (and hope so). Number of anonymous contributors is not useful/interesting for us (LangCom).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: