Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gracefully handle missing libcrypt.so.1 in standalone python builds #26018

Open
jdstrand opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Gracefully handle missing libcrypt.so.1 in standalone python builds #26018

jdstrand opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jdstrand
Copy link
Contributor

jdstrand commented Feb 13, 2025

Once #26010 is fixed, we should gracefully handle missing libcrypt.so.1. This isn't needed for python-build-standalone, but is when influxdb is compiled with older glibc.

It is probably fine to simple Depends on libxcrypt-compat in the deb/rpm packaging. Will have to deal with tarball (perhaps instructions?)

Time estimation: blocked on #26010, then a few days for 'easy stuff', longer if try to do something more involved (strip out usage)

@jdstrand jdstrand added the v3 label Feb 13, 2025
@jdstrand jdstrand self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@jdstrand jdstrand changed the title gracefully handle missing libcrypt.so.1 in standalone python builds Gracefully handle missing libcrypt.so.1 in standalone python builds Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant