742 in doku das anlegen eines frontend projekt beschreiben #778
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request involves updates to the documentation for creating microservices, specifically focusing on frontend and backend service creation. The changes include modifications to the VitePress configuration file to improve navigation structure, and the addition of two new documentation files: The documentation now provides comprehensive guidelines for setting up new microservices, with detailed instructions for both frontend and backend projects. This includes guidance on cloning reference architecture templates, naming conventions, workflow configuration for GitHub Actions, and specific considerations for routing and project setup. The changes aim to provide a clear, structured approach to creating new microservices within the project ecosystem. Assessment against linked issues
The pull request comprehensively addresses the requirements of issue #742 by providing a detailed guide for frontend project creation. The documentation in
The documentation provides step-by-step instructions that enable developers to understand and follow the process of creating a new frontend project, meeting the primary objective of the linked issue. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-backend.md (1)
⚠️ Security: Documentation should follow secure credential management practicesThe security concern is valid. The documentation:
- Explicitly shows default credentials across multiple files
- Lacks warnings about production security
- Doesn't provide guidance on secure credential management
Recommendations:
- Replace explicit password examples with placeholders (e.g.,
<YOUR_SECURE_PASSWORD>)- Add security warnings about changing default credentials
- Include a section on secure credential management for production environments
- Reference the organization's security policies for database credentials
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
23-94: Security concern: Database credentials exposed in documentation.While the documentation is comprehensive, consider:
- Not exposing the default password in documentation
- Providing instructions to change default credentials
- Adding a security warning about using different passwords in production
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any other instances of the default database password in the codebase rg -i "password.*secret" --type mdLength of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search with broader patterns for credentials echo "=== Searching for password patterns ===" rg -i "password|passwort|secret" --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,adoc}' -t docs echo -e "\n=== Searching for database configuration patterns ===" rg -i "jdbc:|oracle.*database|connection.*string" --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,adoc}' -t docs echo -e "\n=== Looking for database setup files ===" fd -t f -e sql "user" -e "database" -e "setup" -e "init"Length of output: 2292
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md (1)
68-69: Address TODO comments regarding path adjustments.The TODO comments indicate missing information about path adjustments and frontend path naming.
Would you like me to help:
- Document the path adjustment process?
- Provide guidance on renaming the existing frontend path?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/.vitepress/config.mts(2 hunks)docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-backend.md(3 hunks)docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/.vitepress/config.mts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Well-structured navigation updates.The changes improve documentation organization by:
- Adding a clear path constant for microservice generation
- Creating a logical hierarchy in the sidebar for microservice-related docs
Also applies to: 93-102
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/index.md (1)
1-28: LGTM! Clear and well-structured introduction to microservice creation.The document provides a good overview and clear navigation to specific guides.
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md (1)
71-84: LGTM! Clear gateway routing configuration.The routing configuration is well-documented with an important warning about route ordering.
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-frontend.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/src/technik/guides/new-microservice/new-service-backend.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Beschreibung:
Dokumentation zur Erstellung eines neuen Frontend-Projekts.
Da sich einige Informationen bei der Erstellung eines Frontend- oder Backend-Services wiederholt hätten, wurden diese eine Ebene drüber ausgelagert.
Definition of Done (DoD):
Dokumentation
Referenzen1:
Closes #742
Summary by CodeRabbit
Footnotes
Nicht zutreffende Referenzen vor dem Speichern entfernen ↩