Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: MachineSetPreflightChecks #11117

Open
2 of 4 tasks
sbueringer opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

Feature: MachineSetPreflightChecks #11117

sbueringer opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/machineset Issues or PRs related to machinesets kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Milestone

Comments

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Aug 29, 2024

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates an issue lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 29, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. area/machineset Issues or PRs related to machinesets labels Aug 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed needs-priority Indicates an issue lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 29, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 29, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Aug 29, 2024

I would like to move this feature to beta and enabled per default in CAPI v1.9.

We've been using this feature in production since it's introduction (in CAPI v1.5).

@fabriziopandini @enxebre @vincepri @killianmuldoon @chrischdi Opinions?

@sbueringer sbueringer self-assigned this Aug 29, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added this to the v1.9 milestone Aug 29, 2024
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

fabriziopandini commented Aug 29, 2024

+1 from me!

Might be, we need a flag to allow folks disabling preflight checks for an entire setup before graduation.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

(I might be misunderstanding what you are suggesting)

I'm only proposing to change the feature gate to: Beta & Default: true at this point (

MachineSetPreflightChecks: {Default: false, PreRelease: featuregate.Alpha},
)

This then still allows folks to disable it

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

fabriziopandini commented Aug 30, 2024

Sorry for not providing enough details.

While there is a the feature flag, it can be used to disable preflight checks for an entire setup, that's correct.
However, after graduation, when the feature flag goes away, there won't be anymore any option to disable preflight checks for an entire setup.

This is why I think that we should consider adding a flag at controller level that allows to do this (we can eventually also build this flag in a way that you can disable specific checks for an entire setup, but TBD)

But we can also consider this after feedbacks when the feature flag is enabled by default

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/assign

for the beta promotion for v1.9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/machineset Issues or PRs related to machinesets kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants