Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] 在模型设置的推理强度选项下增加注释 #6666

Open
Yubaozhi opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

[Request] 在模型设置的推理强度选项下增加注释 #6666

Yubaozhi opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议

Comments

@Yubaozhi
Copy link

Yubaozhi commented Mar 3, 2025

🥰 需求描述

经过查询wiki得知这是openai支持推理模型独享的功能。
但是在设置中并没有注释写出,修改这个设置一定会导致大部分国产模型(如deepseek、spark)崩溃,输出乱码。

🧐 解决方案

在功能选项旁边增加有关该内容的注释,并在对话框出添加该内容的调节选项,便于在切换模型时调整。

📝 补充信息

No response

@Yubaozhi Yubaozhi added the 🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议 label Mar 3, 2025
@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


🥰 Requirement description

After querying the wiki, I learned that this is a feature exclusive to openai support inference models.
However, there are no comments written in the settings. Modifying this setting will definitely cause most domestic models (such as deepseek, spark) to crash and output garbled code.

🧐 Solution

Add comments about the content next to the function options, and add adjustment options for the content in the dialog box to facilitate adjustment when switching models.

📝 Supplementary information

No response

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👀 @Yubaozhi

Thank you for raising an issue. We will investigate into the matter and get back to you as soon as possible.
Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible.
非常感谢您提交 issue。我们会尽快调查此事,并尽快回复您。 请确保您已经提供了尽可能多的背景信息。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🌠 Feature Request New feature or request | 特性与建议
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants