Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing support for fill-lower and fill-upper #2

Open
martenzander opened this issue Feb 3, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

missing support for fill-lower and fill-upper #2

martenzander opened this issue Feb 3, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@martenzander
Copy link

A bundled selector for (::-moz-range-progress, ::-ms-fill-lower) would be nice, as well as a bundled selector to style IEs range ticks. (::-ms-ticks-before, ::-ms-ticks-after, ::-ms-track)

@madeleineostoja
Copy link
Owner

The problem with fill-lower and ticks is that they're vendor specific features, so using them here would only apply to those browsers, and at that point why not just use the vendor pseudos directly?

@martenzander
Copy link
Author

well thats right, but imo it would be nicer to write ::fill-lower instead of both, ::-moz-range-progress and ::-ms-fill-lower. Same for the ticks. A shorthand is easier to remember and it could include all necessary vendor prefixes to cover all supporting browsers.

@madeleineostoja
Copy link
Owner

I thought ticks were an ms only thing?

Might consider including progress/fill-lower, with the caveat that WebKit and blink aren't supported. I'm flat out atm though, would accept a PR if you'd like to submit one?

@martenzander
Copy link
Author

yes, they are ms only, but to style them properly you have to use three different prefixed selectors.
I am busy until the end of march, but I will let you know if I get the time to include the update.

@madeleineostoja
Copy link
Owner

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants