Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better auto-choice of frame sizes for convolution/dispersion/etc #190

Open
mhvk opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Better auto-choice of frame sizes for convolution/dispersion/etc #190

mhvk opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@mhvk
Copy link
Owner

mhvk commented Jul 27, 2020

Should pick a sane number of input samples for FT. Should also include extra padding to avoid edge effects.

@mhvk mhvk added this to the 0.2 milestone Jul 27, 2020
@theXYZT
Copy link
Contributor

theXYZT commented Aug 7, 2020

If you mean for FFT efficiency, I use this: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.fftpack.next_fast_len.html

@mhvk
Copy link
Owner Author

mhvk commented Aug 7, 2020

Partially that, but more generally a smart choice for the amount of padding that gets discarded (beyond the convolution window). Plus perhaps your near-Nyquist taper function in the frequency domain.

@mhvk mhvk modified the milestones: 0.2, 0.3 Mar 30, 2021
@mhvk mhvk modified the milestones: 0.3, 0.4 Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants