We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I trained with mixed datasets, the best result was generated by 76th epoch. The best mPJPE is 56.21, and PAmPJPE is 35.62, which are different from (https://datarelease.blob.core.windows.net/metro/models/2021-02-25-graphormer_h36m_log.txt), MPJPE 51.2, PAmPJPE 34.5.
The command is the same as in EXP.md
python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=8 src/tools/run_gphmer_bodymesh.py --train_yaml Tax-H36m-coco40k-Muco-UP-Mpii/train.yaml --val_yaml human3.6m/valid.protocol2.yaml --arch hrnet-w64 --num_workers 4 --per_gpu_train_batch_size 25 --per_gpu_eval_batch_size 25 --num_hidden_layers 4 --num_attention_heads 4 --lr 1e-4 --num_train_epochs 200 --input_feat_dim 2051,512,128 --hidden_feat_dim 1024,256,64
Looking forward to your reply @kevinlin311tw, thx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
When I trained with mixed datasets, the best result was generated by 76th epoch. The best mPJPE is 56.21, and PAmPJPE is 35.62, which are different from (https://datarelease.blob.core.windows.net/metro/models/2021-02-25-graphormer_h36m_log.txt), MPJPE 51.2, PAmPJPE 34.5.
The command is the same as in EXP.md
python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=8
src/tools/run_gphmer_bodymesh.py
--train_yaml Tax-H36m-coco40k-Muco-UP-Mpii/train.yaml
--val_yaml human3.6m/valid.protocol2.yaml
--arch hrnet-w64
--num_workers 4
--per_gpu_train_batch_size 25
--per_gpu_eval_batch_size 25
--num_hidden_layers 4
--num_attention_heads 4
--lr 1e-4
--num_train_epochs 200
--input_feat_dim 2051,512,128
--hidden_feat_dim 1024,256,64
Looking forward to your reply @kevinlin311tw, thx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: