You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the case of a single continuous endogenous regressor in copulaCorrection can only be estimated using LL. Because bootstrapping with LL takes much longer it would be convenient to also provide the possibility to use enhanced OLS. As by Raluca, this would theoretically be correct as shown in the paper by Park and Gupta.
Suggested syntax: use continuousLL() and continuousOLS() to mark the regressors in favour of continuous() which should be depreciated.
This is not expected to be implemented in the near future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was skimming through the code and issues, but couldn't easily discern whether the estimation with multiple endogenous regressors is supported already. When using OLS, it should be enough to use the copula transformation function (i.e., to extract the normally-distributed and potentially endogenous part of PStar), and inserting that as an additional regressor for each potentially endogenous variable. Should be straightforward to implement. The function may be sensitive to the increment to prevent qnorm to evaluate to NA.
Currently, the case of a single continuous endogenous regressor in copulaCorrection can only be estimated using LL. Because bootstrapping with LL takes much longer it would be convenient to also provide the possibility to use enhanced OLS. As by Raluca, this would theoretically be correct as shown in the paper by Park and Gupta.
Suggested syntax: use
continuousLL()
andcontinuousOLS()
to mark the regressors in favour ofcontinuous()
which should be depreciated.This is not expected to be implemented in the near future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: