You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thanks for this library. It is much appreciated. Good work. :)
I ran into an issue yesterday and I managed to narrow it down to the way the createClient method works within AsyncRedis.
It seems that the method will not create two distinct client instances with the same configuration - as opposed to what the base Redis method implementation would. Instead, it keeps track of created clients and stores them in an internal array, so that a the same instance will be returned when equivalent options are a match.
I'm not sure why it was designed that way. There may be a very valid reason I'm simply unaware of. In any case, this is a problem for situations in which you do need two distinct clients on the same database, such as when one acts as a subscriber and the other as a publisher. You'd be calling createClient method twice on two distinct variables and use them as pub/sub pattern dictates; still, the code would fail at runtime with the following error message:
ERR only (P)SUBSCRIBE / (P)UNSUBSCRIBE / PING / QUIT allowed in this context
The workaround I came up with was to create clients out of base Redis library, then use AsyncRedis.decorate on them. Works like a charm and still allows using promises.
If pooling of client instances really is the intended design for createClient, then I suggest documenting the method accordingly.
Thanks! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
First of all, thanks for this library. It is much appreciated. Good work. :)
I ran into an issue yesterday and I managed to narrow it down to the way the
createClient
method works withinAsyncRedis
.It seems that the method will not create two distinct client instances with the same configuration - as opposed to what the base
Redis
method implementation would. Instead, it keeps track of created clients and stores them in an internal array, so that a the same instance will be returned when equivalent options are a match.I'm not sure why it was designed that way. There may be a very valid reason I'm simply unaware of. In any case, this is a problem for situations in which you do need two distinct clients on the same database, such as when one acts as a subscriber and the other as a publisher. You'd be calling
createClient
method twice on two distinct variables and use them as pub/sub pattern dictates; still, the code would fail at runtime with the following error message:The workaround I came up with was to create clients out of base
Redis
library, then useAsyncRedis.decorate
on them. Works like a charm and still allows using promises.If pooling of client instances really is the intended design for
createClient
, then I suggest documenting the method accordingly.Thanks! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: