You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using the discourse ldap plugin: https://github.com/jonmbake/discourse-ldap-auth
This plugins provides :filter argument in it's configuration. It says: LDAP filter (for group based authentication)
I assume that you can define the users with this filter, which should be able to login to discourse (the forum).
But your documentation says: :filter is the LDAP filter used to search the user entry. It can be used in place of :uid for more flexibility. %{username} will be replaced by the user name processed by :name_proc.
I don't really understand the essence of this description.
Could you please explain this to me?
I am asking, because we REALLY need a way to limit the users which should be allowed to login to our disocurse forum.
If I misunderstood the filter attribute please let me know so I have the possibility to look for an alternative!
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello everyone,
I am using the discourse ldap plugin: https://github.com/jonmbake/discourse-ldap-auth
This plugins provides
:filter
argument in it's configuration. It says:LDAP filter (for group based authentication)
I assume that you can define the users with this filter, which should be able to login to discourse (the forum).
But your documentation says:
:filter is the LDAP filter used to search the user entry. It can be used in place of :uid for more flexibility. %{username} will be replaced by the user name processed by :name_proc.
I don't really understand the essence of this description.
Could you please explain this to me?
I am asking, because we REALLY need a way to limit the users which should be allowed to login to our disocurse forum.
If I misunderstood the filter attribute please let me know so I have the possibility to look for an alternative!
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: