Reasoning effort in ChatCompletionOptions

[besenkmehmet]

Confirm this is a feature request for the .NET library and not the underlying OpenAI API

• This is a feature request for the .NET library

Describe the feature or improvement you are requesting

Support for reasoning_effort in ChatCompletionOptions

https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/reasoning#quickstart

Additional context

No response

[eric-patton-bam]

I'm seconding this. Please add this in so we can set this for the reasoning models.

[joseharriaga]

Thank you for reaching out, @besenkmehmet ! We are planning a release for next week that will include this feature. Please stay tuned!

[Swah]

Thanks for the quick support.

Unless I missed it, I don't think developers can currently add arguments / options with this SDK, in case a new feature becomes available and isn't yet supported. Would it be a good idea to add something like an AdditionalArguments dictionary in ChatCompletionOptions for this type of situation?

[nithrous]

Since it hasn't been released yet, what is the default reasoning level?

[eric-patton-bam]

Since it hasn't been released yet, what is the default reasoning level?

The default is medium if nothing is given, according to the OpenAI documentation:

[MarioMartinPlaza]

I'm waiting for the new feature.

Also I'm agree with @Swah i think is neccesary have a option to add new params becasue OpenAi add new funcionality faster than new release of the nuget (AdditionalArguments dictionary in ChatCompletionOptions is a great option)

Thanks in advance!

[GunterGlad]

Any update on the release date?

[joseharriaga]

Support for reasoning_effort has been released with version 2.2.0-beta.1:
🔗 https://www.nuget.org/packages/OpenAI/2.2.0-beta.1
Try the new property called ReasoningEffortLevel in ChatCompletionOptions.

We're also exploring adding something similar to an AdditionalProperties dictionary in the future. Thank you for your feedback!

[besenkmehmet]

There is still an open feature request which requests the same thing with a workaround if anyone is interested.
#132 (comment)

We would love to see it implemented in the official package.