You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
low-porosity is not in WN, but both low and porosity are. we could add it (as there's high-energy, low-tension), but if we use the conventionality and compositionality criteria for MWEs, I don't think it fits. how to handle it in the interface? (if we had low porosity we'd be annotating both tokens)
or should we just handle this at the pre-processing level? (it's more consistent, at least) how?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
low-porosity
is not in WN, but bothlow
andporosity
are. we could add it (as there'shigh-energy
,low-tension
), but if we use the conventionality and compositionality criteria for MWEs, I don't think it fits. how to handle it in the interface? (if we hadlow porosity
we'd be annotating both tokens)or should we just handle this at the pre-processing level? (it's more consistent, at least) how?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: