strange case of marks

[arademaker]

why dark-brown has the superscript JJ1?

[arademaker]

It should be a1 as other single word tokens?

[arademaker]

why MWE does not follow the presentation of single tokens that, once annotated, have the superscript on the right with pos+buffer-sense where buffer-sense is a single-digited sense in the buffer.

[odanoburu]

does 3144dc1 fix the problem?

although I made it show s1 as it's an adjective satellite; or do you think we should collapse it to adjective? (I guess annotation-wise it makes more sense, as satellites are not a real PoS..)

why MWE does not follow the presentation of single tokens that, once annotated, have the superscript on the right with pos+buffer-sense where buffer-sense is a single-digited sense in the buffer.

not sure I understand what you mean, but could it be that the problem is that dark brown is a glob, but dark-brown is not?

[odanoburu]

can I close this, @arademaker ?

[arademaker]

No. In the buffer any@dark-brown the superscripts are only numbers. In

(n) anthophyllite | a dark brown mineral of the amphibole group ; magnesium iron silicate ;

the glob drak-brown should have the superscript a1. My point is why dark-brown has superscript s1 (should be a1) but the glob only a number without the PoS?

Yep, our PoS should be only : n, a, r, v

[odanoburu]

this should be fixed now in dev by 4b168e2

[arademaker]

this fixes the code in dev branch, right?

[odanoburu]

fd2f538 fixes it in master too.

[odanoburu]

• must show PoS of globs too.