-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tests to ensure all control file fields present in an upstream package index will be present in pulp_deb #388
Comments
From: @quba42 (quba42) Note: This issue essentially adds test coverage for the fixes for https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7190. It serves as a follow on issue, so these essential fixes can be merged without waiting for test coverage for now. |
From: @quba42 (quba42) Clarification: This relates to APT publications. (Verbatim publications must necessarily guarantee this already, so we do not need a test for them). |
From: pulpbot (pulpbot) PR: #203 |
This issue has been marked 'stale' due to lack of recent activity. If there is no further activity, the issue will be closed in another 30 days. Thank you for your contribution! |
This issue is no longer marked for closure. |
Author: @quba42 (quba42)
Redmine Issue: 7266, https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7266
We should have test packages/assertions etc. to ensure that each control file field present in an upstream repo makes it into our published repos.
Should be ensured for both simple and structured publish.
Note that "Description-md5" and "Build-Essential" are pure metadata fields that may be present in (upstream) Package indices but are not present in the package control files.
We are ignoring such fields for now.
Any attempt to support them would be a new feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: