Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for automatic publishing and distributing #406

Open
pulpbot opened this issue Jan 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Add support for automatic publishing and distributing #406

pulpbot opened this issue Jan 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
.feature CHANGES/<issue_number>.feature

Comments

@pulpbot
Copy link
Member

pulpbot commented Jan 4, 2022

Author: @quba42 (quba42)

Redmine Issue: 8684, https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8684


None

@pulpbot
Copy link
Member Author

pulpbot commented Jan 4, 2022

From: pulpbot (pulpbot)
Date: 2021-05-04T10:52:24Z


PR: #274

@pulpbot pulpbot added this to the Wishlist milestone Jan 4, 2022
@pulpbot
Copy link
Member Author

pulpbot commented Jan 4, 2022

From: hostedpower (hostedpower)
Date: 2021-08-09T22:45:04Z


This would be a great feature to have! :)

@pulpbot
Copy link
Member Author

pulpbot commented Jan 4, 2022

From: @quba42 (quba42)
Date: 2021-08-10T06:25:09Z


hostedpower wrote:

This would be a great feature to have! :)

Unfortunately it is currently blocked by an unsolved design question: Namely how to reliably decide for each distribution whether to associate it with a new APT or verbatim publication, and whether any APT publications should use structured and/or simple mode.

This feature is also not of very high priority to the plugin maintainers, so if you do want to help move it along, it would be helpful, if you could drive the design discussion. Perhaps you could say how exactly you would like this feature to work. (In what order are you creating repos, repo versions, publications, and distributions? Are your publications using APT and/or verbatim publisher and what modes is the APT publisher using?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 25, 2022

This issue has been marked 'stale' due to lack of recent activity. If there is no further activity, the issue will be closed in another 30 days. Thank you for your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
.feature CHANGES/<issue_number>.feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants