One torrent is displayed in two error categories #22218
Comments
|
@glassez FYI |
It has two trackers with different errors. |
Isn't there a priority? A tracker error should be prioritized over other errors. Anyway, it's weird to see one torrent in multiple categories. |
|
@stalkerok |
|
No, that's not it. But it doesn't matter anymore, since I've outlined its essence above. |
|
I understand, but it doesn't seem like expected behavior to me. IMO there should be a priority in the classification of errors, otherwise in some cases the separation into other error and tracker error doesn't make sense. Torrents with many trackers for example, or when using automatic tracker addition, the torrent will always be in both other error and tracker error. Also, it would be nice to split the tracker filter widget into tracker status and trackers. This will allow to quickly find a certain tracker with tracker error status, for example, if there are a lot of torrents with different errors. |
|
It looks like you still want to have yet another torrent status aggregating the status of all its trackers according to some rule. |
|
No, the tracker error is the priority for me, I don't care if I have torrents with other errors. I just expect that there are different torrents in those categories. |
#22219 should take care of this problem. |
|
Good. Since this is expected behavior, it might be worth changing this issue to a feature request.
|
I don't get it. Where's the harm in having the torrent in both? |
They behave consistently with regular items (torrent is matched by each item it belongs to), so I'm against changing it. Besides, such a change will lead to the fact that it will not be possible to filter torrents by each of these criteria, but only by one of them (i.e. one couldn't find all torrents with tracker warnings or network related errors). |
IMO it just makes filtering more difficult. But I won't insist on it.
What do you think about that? |
It's still unclear what exactly you mean. |
TRACKER STATUS TRACKERS |
It makes no sense to separate this into a separate filter if it continues to work the same way as before. But if you change its behavior, then (as I mentioned above) we will lose some of the current usability. |
|
When there are a lot of torrents with errors, it is impossible to find out if there are errors on a certain tracker without the help of third party tools. Here is a good example: other error 5206, 5205 torrents have a tracker temporarily down, to find out which tracker is down on 5206 I need to go through all of them manually. |
|
TRACKER STATUS TRACKERS Yeah, that makes more sense. |
Is separating the filter supposed to help you with this? |
|
@stalkerok Do you mean that it may be better to have a more granular filter for each For e.g. I think having a |
Of course! There will be two filters instead of one: by tracker and by tracker status. This way I can filter out the last torrent with an error.
No, I'm only interested in tracker errors. As a rule, for me other errors, are temporary errors, as all unnecessary trackers are removed at the stage of adding a torrent (or later). The way I see it is this: |
Could you describe entire scenario? |
I have two filters, one filter I put on other error, the second filter I put on each tracker in turn, that way I get a match and the torrent with that tracker and that error will be shown. |
qBittorrent & operating system versions
qBittorrent v5.0.3 (64-bit)
Qt: 6.7.3
Libtorrent: 1.2.19.0
Boost: 1.86.0
OpenSSL: 3.4.0
zlib: 1.3.1
What is the problem?
There is another problem with displaying the same torrent in two error categories.
You can use an old release of ubuntu (official) to test it.
Also, if you stop the torrent, the errors don't go away. This is a long-standing problem, but I thought I'd mention it again.
Steps to reproduce
No response
Additional context
No response
Log(s) & preferences file(s)
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: