-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vehicle_type mapped incorrectly for 1979-2004 data #102
Comments
1979-2004 lookup:
But from the frequency table above you can see that a bunch of these are unused. Table for 2005 onwards:
|
Hi Colin. Greetings from far away. I was going to say the same thing under #101: one problem with this package is we never processed/tested 1979-2004. So any contribution from both tickets would be great. As Robin said, @mem48 had warned us about the grid issues, too. I think at this stage if we could update the docs, would be great for users of the package. |
I figured that this bit was buggy because noone used it. I'll submit some PRs in a bit :) |
Hey @cmcaine belated thanks from me also for identifying this issue. Are you still planning to take a look (know you have other important priorities so I'm happy to try to fix this)? |
My intention is to fix it sometime in October. I am very happy for anyone
else to fix it, I'm not precious about it :)
…On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 19:08, Robin ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @cmcaine <https://github.com/cmcaine> belated thanks from me also for
fixing this. Are you still planning to take a look (know you have other
important priorities so I'm happy to try to fix this)?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#102?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABNZA6JOWQRN7DNTJPH3BYLQFQXIDA5CNFSM4IKTDK7KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD4XFR6Q#issuecomment-523131130>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNZA6K5GP6MDGBN7MAN5SLQFQXIDANCNFSM4IKTDK7A>
.
|
I would be having a go if I understood this 100% and might just ping @cmcaine in case he would remember a solution he had in mind at the time. |
I suspect the package does not use the appropriate schema for the data. It's probably using the more recent lookup table that's in the range -1:99 compared to the old table that goes from -1:113.
Probably other variables are mapped incorrectly if this is the case. The correct schema is contained in the 1979_2004 zip with the csvs as a XLS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: