You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the Web Frameworks page, the server frameworks seem to be ordered alphabetically, but not entirely. From Actix to Warp they are, then comes Axum, Poem and Salvo.
I'm thinking that ordering by the number of crates.io downloads should be more appropriate here, as that can be an indicative of a more mature ecosystem. I know that this is a static site, so maybe that could be made upfront? Or maybe zola could check the number of downloads when generating the pages? Don't know, but in my opinion an alphabetical ordering seems strange, and it would be better for newcomers to see the more mature frameworks at the top.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On the Web Frameworks page, the server frameworks seem to be ordered alphabetically, but not entirely. From Actix to Warp they are, then comes Axum, Poem and Salvo.
I'm thinking that ordering by the number of crates.io downloads should be more appropriate here, as that can be an indicative of a more mature ecosystem. I know that this is a static site, so maybe that could be made upfront? Or maybe zola could check the number of downloads when generating the pages? Don't know, but in my opinion an alphabetical ordering seems strange, and it would be better for newcomers to see the more mature frameworks at the top.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: