Energetic Opaque Elephant
Medium
The WeightedIndex
contract is designed as an upgradeable contract but lacks the implementation of a storage gap. This omission could result in storage conflicts during future upgrades, potentially corrupting data or introducing critical bugs. Including a storage gap would safeguard the contract against such issues, even if the protocol currently does not foresee upgrades.
The WeightedIndex
contract inherits from OpenZeppelin’s Initializable
, indicating it is part of an upgradeable contract system. However, it does not include a storage gap to account for future state variable additions. Without a storage gap, any new variables added during an upgrade could overwrite existing storage slots, causing storage collisions.
- The contract is deployed as an upgradeable contract via a proxy.
- Future upgrades to the contract may introduce new state variables.
No response
- The contract is upgraded with new state variables.
- Storage collisions occur because the new state variables overwrite existing storage slots.
- This corruption could lead to loss of data, unexpected behavior, or vulnerabilities in the contract.
The WeightedIndex contract will suffer from storage conflicts during upgrades, leading to data corruption or critical bugs. This can result in disrupted functionality or vulnerabilities that attackers could exploit.
No response
Introduce a storage gap in the WeightedIndex contract by appending an unused fixed-size array at the end of the storage layout, as shown below:
contract WeightedIndex is Initializable, IInitializeSelector, DecentralizedIndex {
// Storage gap for upgradeability
+ uint256[50] private __gap;
}
Even if the protocol does not foresee upgrades, adding a storage gap is a precautionary measure that ensures safe upgrades in the future if the need arises.