LICENSE?

[tony]

Thank you for the project!

I come here from PyCQA/flake8-import-order#163 where license was being brought up

Is there any reason why UNLICENSE was picked instead of ISC / MIT / BSD / whatever flake8 uses?

The reason I bring it up is I've heard some about the ambiguity of UNLICENSE

[tlocke]

Hi @tony, I'm open to changing the license. I like the MIT license, except for the attribution clause. So how about the MIT-0 license? https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit-0/

[tony]

@tlocke

I assume the attribution is this: "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software."

If so MIT-0 makes sense. Similar enough to flake8's

[tlocke]

Yes that's right. I've made that change now.

[tony]

@tlocke Huzzah! Perhaps worth mentioning in PyCQA/flake8-import-order#163?