You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My program queries for pending next block inside aloop via eth/v1/builder/header{slot}/{parent_block_hash}/{validator_pub_key}
Should I make the assumption that the final pending block ( the last version before slot ends) hash will always match between the 2 relays ?
Based on some preliminary testing, it does seem like this is the case.
But I do get some cases where the expected consistency is not observed. ( the final version of block hash from EU does not match that from US). I am not sure if this is because my assumption is wrong or that my polling loop missed a update before the slot rolls over to the next one.
Can the team comment ?
If I am interested in polling the latest best pending block hash from ultrasound, would it be sufficient just polling 1 of the EU/US relay ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My program queries for pending next block inside aloop via eth/v1/builder/header{slot}/{parent_block_hash}/{validator_pub_key}
Should I make the assumption that the final pending block ( the last version before slot ends) hash will always match between the 2 relays ?
Based on some preliminary testing, it does seem like this is the case.
But I do get some cases where the expected consistency is not observed. ( the final version of block hash from EU does not match that from US). I am not sure if this is because my assumption is wrong or that my polling loop missed a update before the slot rolls over to the next one.
Can the team comment ? If I am interested in polling the latest best pending block hash from ultrasound, would it be sufficient just polling 1 of the EU/US relay ?
My understanding is that the relays are not connected like that, and it would be entirely predicated upon the validator location as to which relay would be the proper choice. Since you have 2 epochs of a head start, you can crawl for their IP's and based off that decide. Over time, it would be sufficient to just associate the validator identity with the node operator and have that determination recorded without having to trace the IP address (assuming that the ip address to that machine doesn't change or isn't re-allocated from whomever provides the ip address space for the underlying instance).
if you need additional help just reach out to me on telegram, @sambacha (I am not affiliated with the team, rather we operate SecureRPC.com another relay).
My program queries for pending next block inside aloop via
eth/v1/builder/header{slot}/{parent_block_hash}/{validator_pub_key}
Should I make the assumption that the final pending block ( the last version before slot ends) hash will always match between the 2 relays ?
Based on some preliminary testing, it does seem like this is the case.
But I do get some cases where the expected consistency is not observed. ( the final version of block hash from EU does not match that from US). I am not sure if this is because my assumption is wrong or that my polling loop missed a update before the slot rolls over to the next one.
Can the team comment ?
If I am interested in polling the latest best pending block hash from ultrasound, would it be sufficient just polling 1 of the EU/US relay ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: