Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standardize more organization-wide labels #80

Closed
annevk opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Standardize more organization-wide labels #80

annevk opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Apr 3, 2018

Sometimes even across organizations:

  • addition/proposal
  • removal/deprecation
  • do not merge yet
  • needs implementer interest
  • topic: shadow
  • topic: custom elements
  • waiting for tests (rename to "needs tests"?)
  • interop
  • needs compat analysis
  • normative change
@domfarolino
Copy link
Member

I’m strongly in favor of these. Particularly “needs tests” (my preferred name for it). I like this.

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Apr 3, 2018 •
edited
Loading

  • compat
  • clarification

I'm a little unsure on the utility of "normative change"; it seems hard to apply consistently.

annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2018
@annevk
Standardize more labels
4641fca 
This standardizes a bunch of additional labels as proposed in #80 and makes it easy to add them to a new repository by providing a script that takes care of that.
@annevk annevk mentioned this issue Apr 4, 2018
Merged
@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Apr 4, 2018

I created #81 with both your feedback taken into account. (I already adjusted whatwg/html to use "needs tests".)

annevk added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2018
@annevk
Standardize more labels
2c8bd85 
This standardizes a bunch of additional labels as proposed in #80 and makes it easy to add them to a new repository by providing a script that takes care of that.
@annevk annevk closed this as completed in e3cbc33 May 28, 2018
@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Dec 16, 2019

Came across this when pondering what scripts to add for #152. Is anyone running labels.py regularly?

@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Dec 20, 2019

I run it when we do updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@foolip @domenic @annevk @domfarolino