-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
algorithms 101 #16
Comments
YES. great idea. |
Great. Keen to check it out. |
Definitely |
Totes a great idea. |
yeah this would be awesome. I've been writing js for a while but don't have a CS degree. I get asked about algorithms and don't know much about the specifics +1 |
@linclark I think this is a great idea. Would you want any help/assistance? Let me know. I'd be happy to play-test or help with a section or two. |
Yes, would be very interested in this. |
Yes please! |
Yes, please! This would be awesome. |
thanks for the feedback, everyone! @rosskukulinski I added a few scaffold exercises and issues to track their development, let me know if you have any questions. |
@linclark ran through the Welcome and quick-find on OSX with no problems. Looking good! I do wonder if the fact that algorithm code solutions seems to come directly from the video is a downside? |
I had thought about that myself. In the end, I think it's still valuable because it gives the learner experience walking through each of the algorithms, even if it isn't as challenging. One thing to do to make it more challenging could be to have an exercise a the end of each section in which they have to apply an algorithm to a real life situation. For example, the Coursera course has you apply UnionFind to the percolation problem. It would take a lot of work to come up with applications that were challenging enough but not too challenging. Another way to engage the learner more might be animating the validation. For example, if the learner was working on ShellSort, they'd see an animated version of this chart running their submission next to an animation of the solution. |
Good points. I like your idea of having a final exercise for each section that applies the algorithms they've used (can you say, 'hello module reuse!') to a harder problem. |
This is a fab workshop and off to a great start from the current exercises. Would love to see an exercise on counting steps as one the many ways of assessing an algorithm's speed. Not sure about whether it's in scope or how to go about it through. All i saw out of the box was |
Is anybody (@linclark) working on this currently? If not, I am happy to continue further development. |
Mentioned in the issue you opened there, but will add here too... feel free to submit PRs for the open issues. |
Thanks.. Been thinking about those based on data structures, like BFS based on binary tree, shall we use existing implementations or another workshop with all of them and possibly export solutions so the workshop can be used as a dependency? |
Still on the fence about whether this would be helpful as a workshopper, so looking for other's opinions.
The idea is to take a college intro level Algorithms course (like this one from Princeton), and create an exercise for each algorithm. This should hopefully make the course (which is taught in Java) more accessible to JS devs.
I've started testing it out at https://github.com/linclark/algorithms-101, and will continue working on it if others think it would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: