Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DA PKI Revocation of PAI and VID-scoped PAA by Vendor #459

Closed
ashcherbakov opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

DA PKI Revocation of PAI and VID-scoped PAA by Vendor #459

ashcherbakov opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ashcherbakov
Copy link
Contributor

ashcherbakov commented Mar 23, 2023

User Stories:

  1. Revocation of a VID-scoped PAI

    A Vendor with DCL write privilege can submit a transaction to publish the location of the CRL distribution point for a PAA associated with the Vendor ID. This information can be updated or deleted by the Vendor with the same Vendor ID.

  2. Revocation of a DAC

    A Vendor with DCL write privilege can submit a transaction to publish the location of the CRL distribution point for a PAI associated with the Vendor ID. This information can be updated or deleted by the Vendor with the same Vendor ID.

Revocation of non-VID scoped PAAs is out of scope for this ticket.

Acceptance criteria:

@ashcherbakov ashcherbakov changed the title Revocation of PAI/DAC: by proof of key possession Revocation of PAI/DAC: by Vendor Apr 28, 2023
@ashcherbakov ashcherbakov changed the title Revocation of PAI/DAC: by Vendor DA PKI Revocation: by Vendor May 2, 2023
@ashcherbakov ashcherbakov changed the title DA PKI Revocation: by Vendor DA PKI Revocation of PAI and VID-scoped PAA by Vendor May 12, 2023
@ashcherbakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new update:

DCL software SHALL validate the uniqueness of Label and DataUrl of each entry.

https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec/pull/7262/files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants